Sustainable Resource-based City Planning Using Urban Ecosystem Services
Abstract
Most resource-based cities (RBC) are the result of resource-based industrialization processes, leading to a heterogeneous composition and configuration of urban areas seldom guided by proper urban planning policies. Furthermore, this urbanization has resulted in severe fragmentation of urban ecosystems and generated negative impacts to human well-being. In this paper, we put forward a novel urban planning approach using an ecosystem services perspective for achieving sustainable development in Chinese RBC. An urban ecosystem services simulation model, built using an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and expert opinion, and an urban classification model, built usingcommuting radius and geographic information system (GIS), were used to assess past urbanization and to guide the future urban planning. The results showed a rapid land use change in different sub-systems of Tangshan city from 1990 to 2010, providing relative values of each type of land per unit in three sub-systems, and detected the change of ecosystem services in three sub-systems and the change of ecosystem services per capita in the whole administrative urban area. We suggest that (a) long-term, stable, and ecosystem-services-based land use policies and urban planning approaches are needed; (b) the optimum adjustment of the human-natural relationship should be implemented into suburb for priority; and (c) highlight an urban planning approach covering economic, social, and natural dimensions for achieving sustainable development.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Baojuan, S., Rongrong, Z., Ying, Z., 2011, Empirical Analysis of Tangshan Economic Growth and Environmental Pollution, Energy Procedia, 5(0):2392-2396.
Bastian, O., Haase, D., Grunewald, K., 2012, Ecosystem properties, potentials and services – The EPPS conceptual framework and an urban application example, Ecological Indicators, 21:7-16.
Bolund, P., Hunhammar, S., 1999, Ecosystem services in urban areas, Ecological economics, 29(2):293-301.
Boone, C. G., Cook, E., Hall, S. J., Nation, M. L., Grimm, N. B., Raish, C. B., Finch, D. M., York, A. M., 2012, A comparative gradient approach as a tool for understanding and managing urban ecosystems, Urban Ecosystems, 15(4):795-807.
Boyd, J., Banzhaf, S., 2007, What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units, Ecological Economics, 63(2):616-626.
Breuste, J., Qureshi, S., 2011, Urban sustainability, urban ecology and the Society for Urban Ecology (SURE), Urban Ecosystems, 14(3):313-317.
Carter, S. K., Keuler, N. S., Pidgeon, A. M., Radeloff, V. C., 2014, Evaluating the influence of conservation plans on land protection actions in Wisconsin, USA, Biological Conservation, 178(0):37-49.
Costanza, R., 2008, Ecosystem services: Multiple classification systems are needed, Biological Conservation, 141(2):350-352.
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., Groot, R. d., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., 1998, The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital.
Ernstson, H., Sörlin, S., 2013, Ecosystem services as technology of globalization: On articulating values in urban nature, Ecological Economics 86(0):274-284.
Fernández, I. C., Simonetti, J. A., 2013, Small mammal assemblages in fragmented shrublands of urban areas of Central Chile, Urban Ecosystems, 16(2):377-387.
Fisher, B., Turner, R. K., Morling, P., 2009, Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making, Ecological Economics, 68(3):643-653.
Gómez-Baggethun, E., Barton, D. N., 2013, Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning, Ecological Economics, 86(0):235-245.
Gibb, H., Hochuli, D. F., 2002, Habitat fragmentation in an urban environment: large and small fragments support different arthropod assemblages, Biological Conservation, 106(1):91-100.
Jansson, Å., 2013, Reaching for a sustainable, resilient urban future using the lens of ecosystem services, Ecological Economics, 86(0):285-291.
Kroll, F., Müller, F., Haase, D., Fohrer, N., 2012, Rural–urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics, Land Use Policy, 29(3):521-535.
Larondelle, N., Haase, D., 2013, Urban ecosystem services assessment along a rural–urban gradient: A cross-analysis of European cities, Ecological Indicators, 29(0):179-190.
Larondelle, N., Haase, D., Kabisch, N., 2014, Mapping the diversity of regulating ecosystem services in European cities, Global Environmental Change, 26(0):119-129.
Li, F., Wang, R., Paulussen, J., Liu, X., 2005, Comprehensive concept planning of urban greening based on ecological principles: a case study in Beijing, China, Landscape and Urban Planning, 72(4):325-336.
Liu, Z., He, C., Zhou, Y., Wu, J., 2014, How much of the world’s land has been urbanized, really? A hierarchical framework for avoiding confusion, Landscape Ecology, 29(5):763-771.
Ma, M., Lu, Z., Sun, Y., 2008, Population growth, urban sprawl and landscape integrity of Beijing City, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 15(4):326-330.
Musacchio, L. R., Coulson, R. N., 2001, Landscape ecological planning process for wetland, waterfowl, and farmland conservation, Landscape and Urban Planning, 56(3–4):125-147.
Pauleit, S., Duhme, F., 2000, Assessing the environmental performance of land cover types for urban planning, Landscape and urban planning, 52(1):1-20.
Pickett, S. T. A., Cadenasso, M. L., 2006, Advancing urban ecological studies: Frameworks, concepts, and results from the Baltimore Ecosystem Study, Austral Ecology, 31(2):114-125.
Ramalho, C. E., Hobbs, R. J., 2012, Time for a change: dynamic urban ecology, Trends Ecol Evol, 27(3):179-88.
Saaty, T. L., 2003, Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary, European Journal of Operational Research, 145(1):85-91.
SYT, 1990, Statistical Yearbook of Tangshan, China Statistics Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
SYT, 2000, Statistical Yearbook of Tangshan, China Statistics Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
SYT, 2010, Statistical Yearbook of Tangshan, China Statistics Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
Wu, J., 2014, Urban ecology and sustainability: The state-of-the-science and future directions, Landscape and Urban Planning, 125:209-221.
Zhang, B., Xie, G., Zhang, C., Zhang, J., 2012, The economic benefits of rainwater-runoff reduction by urban green spaces: a case study in Beijing, China, J Environ Manage, 100:65-71.
Zhang, M., Lu, Z., 2012, Research in sustainability of the three economic rims in China——based on Ecological Footprint, Environmental and sustainable development, (6):79-82 (in Chinese).
Zhang, M., Tan, F., Lu, Z., 2014, Resource-based cities (RBC): a road to sustainability, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology.
Zhang M, Lu Z. 2014. Assessment of ecosystem services change in china three major economic rims: A hierarchical framework based on GIS. International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering,7:2374-2379.
Zhang M, Lu Z, He X, Zhang X, Zhang H, Gu G, Wu J. 2015. Assessing ecological sustainability of Chinas three major economic rims by ecological footprint. International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering,.8:2817-2822.
Zhao, J., Xiao, L., Tang, L., Shi, L., Su, X., Wang, H., Song, Y., Shao, G., 2014, Effects of spatial form on urban commute for major cities in China, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 21(4):361-368.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

Revista de la Facultad de Ingeniería,
ISSN: 2443-4477; ISSN-L:0798-4065
Edif. del Decanato de la Facultad de Ingeniería,
3º piso, Ciudad Universitaria,
Apartado 50.361, Caracas 1050-A,
Venezuela.
© Universidad Central de Venezuela